Affichage des articles dont le libellé est English. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est English. Afficher tous les articles

02/12/2025

Socialism Is Neither a Sin nor a Crime
Lessons from Mamdani’s victory in New York

Faber Cuervo, 2/12/2025
Translated by Tlaxcala

If socialism were a “sin” or a crime, why would a socialist candidate have won the mayoralty of New York, the most representative city of capitalism? Socialism is the highest achievement to which politics—understood as care for others—can aspire. Authentic socialists seek to make human freedoms effective, those that truly guarantee dignity. Socialism is “good living”: that nothing necessary should be lacking for any of us, without distinction of skin color, beliefs, sexual orientation or social class. No one is free until they have secured their freedom to be well nourished, their freedom to obtain good health care, good education, a safe home, and a dignified job. Capitalism is a raffle cage of hamsters running endlessly in circles so that every two weeks they can buy the few freedoms the market offers them.

Molly Crabapple

That Zohran Mamdani, a socialist of Indian origin, has conquered the New York mayoralty is a breath of fresh air, the possibility of spreading socialist thought, refining the ideological line, reorganizing social bases, and strengthening a great party of manual and intellectual workers not only in the United States but in Latin America and the world.

The rejection, obstruction and crushing of socialist projects have historically been ordered from Washington and New York, the anti-communist capitals of the planet. Like an extension of the Ku Klux Klan, they demonized everything suspected of being “red”; on U.S. soil any allusion to socialism was prohibited, McCarthyism was born, figures accused of being communist were persecuted and expelled (Charlie Chaplin, the great comic actor, among them), and the labor movement was dismantled.

But history keeps surprising us with its dialectical turns and paradoxes. Today, in the 21st century, in the year 2025, while another Henry Kissinger reappears with his Operation Condor that filled Latin America with dictatorships that demonized, persecuted, tortured and assassinated thousands of socialists, a migrant with socialist thinking wins the mayoralty of New York. It happens that the new emperor, Donald Trump, listens in his Oval Office to the “extraterrestrial” Mamdani, accepted into the political sphere reluctantly.

Socialism has slipped into the country that banned it. It finds its way into the Big Apple, strolls down Wall Street. “I would prefer not to,” Bartleby would say. But this is an idea that has circulated for more than a century and a half—an idea forced to face attacks of all kinds, from all sorts of civil, ecclesiastical, and military authorities. They will have to learn to live with it; no one knows what they will try to do to topple it, just as they did in many other countries.

Portrait of the bourgeoisie, 1939-1940, David Alfaro Siqueiros, Ciudad de México, Sindicato Mexicano de Electricistas

The Wobblies (1979)
A documentary on the IWW by Stewart Bird and Deborah Shaffer

The Wobblies (1979) par Fausto Giudice

A documentary on the IWW by Stewart Bird and Deborah Shaffer

Lire sur Substack

30/11/2025

Pas de musique sans justice/No Music without Justice
Lettre ouverte au directeur de la Philarmonie de Paris, Olivier Mantei
Open Letter to Olivier Mantei, Director General of the Philharmonie de Paris

English version after the French original
Ce dimanche 30 novembre 2025, le Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra donnera un concert à la Philarmonie de Paris (Cité de la Musique) sous la direction de son directeur musical Lahav Shani, qui est aussi directeur musical de l’Orchestre philarmonique d’Israël et sera celui de l’Orchestre philarmonique de Munich à partir de septembre 2026. Un précédent concert donné le 6 novembre au même endroit par l’Orchestre symphonique d’Israël sous la même direction avait été le théâtre d’incidents, à la suite desquels 4 manifestants propalestiniens ont été mis en examen et ont déposé à leur tour diverses plaintes pour agressions et violation du secret de l’enquête. Plusieurs organisation viennent d’adresser la lettre ci-dessous au directeur de la Philarmonie.-Tlaxcala

Jeudi 27 novembre 2025

Monsieur le Directeur,

Depuis le début du génocide à Gaza, on atteste de près de 70 000 personnes assassiné.e.s, hommes, femmes et enfants compris. Toujours à Gaza, ce sont 345 personnes qui ont été assassinées et 889 blessées par l’armée israélienne, depuis l’entrée en vigueur du « cessez-le-feu », le 11 octobre dernier, cessez-le-feu violé plus de 500 fois. En deux ans, c’est 6 fois la bombe d’Hiroshima qui s’est écrasée sur un territoire d’à peine 150 kilomètres carrés. L’aide humanitaire et médicale reste bloquée alors qu’avec l’hiver les épidémies s’apprêtent à emboîter le pas à la famine. Tous les jours les cadavres s’amoncèlent lorsqu’ils ont la « chance » d’être retrouvés. Lundi 24 novembre, c’est en armes que les milices israéliennes ont chassé les enfants du Théâtre national palestinien (El-Hakawati Theatre) de Jérusalem occupée. Ces armes feront certainement moins parler d’elles que de pauvres fumigènes brandis face aux ambassadeurs culturels de l'État d’Israël.

Le génocide, tel qu’il a été caractérisé par les instances de droit international compétentes, se poursuit sous nos yeux. Et vous, que faites-vous ?

Protestations contre une série de concerts de l'Israel Symphony Orchestra au Carnegie Hall de New York, 15 octobre 2025


Non content d’inviter l’Israel Philharmonic Orchestra (IPO) et son chef titulaire, ambassadeurs officiels de l’état colonial en plein génocide, non content d’accueillir ces musicien.ne.s qui se font le relais de la déshumanisation des Palestinien.ne.s par des propos de désinformation condamnables sur leurs réseaux sociaux à l’instar d’Eleonora Lutsky qui nous parle de « Hamaswood » et Kirill Mihanovsky qui désigne les Palestinien.ne.s  de « monstrueux voisins », non content d’attaquer en justice des militant.e.s pacifiques qui appellent au boycott légitime des institutions culturelles israéliennes qui participent à la normalisation du génocide, vous, vous décidez de vous enfoncer avec votre institution dans le mensonge en espérant ne jamais avoir à assumer vos responsabilités face à l’histoire et face à la justice.

Vous avez menti à vos salarié.e.s lors d’une assemblée générale extraordinaire en qualifiant de violent.e.s des militant.e.s pacifistes, en passant sous silence la violence des insultes racistes et homophobes d’une partie du public, en affirmant que vous ne saviez pas que l’orchestre allait jouer l’hymne israélien alors qu’il l’interprète régulièrement lors de ces tournées. Car oui, cet hymne n’a pas été joué en réaction à l’action de nos camarades, c’était déjà un acte prémédité.

Vous avez été cordialement invité, au regard des appels palestiniens et dans le cadre du droit international, à annuler les venues de Lahav Shani, de l’IPO et du Jerusalem Quartet pour le rôle institutionnel qu’ils occupent dans la politique d’effacement par la culture du crime de génocide commis par Israël. À ces appels, là encore, vous avez répondu par le mensonge et par l’instrumentalisation outrancière des artistes palestinien.ne.s programmé.e.s dans votre institution pour justifier votre collaboration avec les institutions culturelles de l’état génocidaire. Ce mardi 25 novembre, vous avez décidé d’assumer cet agenda politique et d’entraîner toute votre institution dans le discours de propagande en répondant positivement à la demande de Lahav Shani de s’expliquer auprès de vos salarié.e.s. Un discours d'explication qui n’est autre qu'un redoublement de condamnation qualifiant la protestation pacifiste d’ « attaque armée » à l’encontre de l’identité israélienne. Or, chacun des appels à boycott que vous avez reçus était très clair sur la nature de l’action : « nous n’appelons pas à boycotter des artistes du fait de leur nationalité israélienne mais du fait de leur participation institutionnelle à la politique d’effacement des vies palestiniennes orchestrée par l’État israélien. »

Vous imposez à vos salarié.e.s le discours de propagande par l’explication - hasbara - alors que vous refusez le dialogue avec celles et ceux qui vous alertent depuis le début sur cette complicité avec le pire. C’est votre manière de passer sous silence les voix palestiniennes.

Cacher vos décisions derrière le supposé apolitisme de la musique classique relevait déjà de l’outrage face aux souffrances endurées par les Palestinien.ne.s depuis plus de deux ans et à l’égard du droit international. Devions-nous espérer, après un tel acharnement à maintenir la collaboration avec les ambassadeurs du génocide notamment par le recours démesuré à la force policière et judiciaire, que vous reveniez à la raison ? Vous êtes aujourd’hui prêt à excuser un tel affront à la dignité humaine et au droit international - comme l’a été l’hymne de l'État génocidaire qui a retenti dans vos murs. Et tout cela pourquoi ? Pour ne pas prendre le risque d’annuler un concert avec Martha Argerich parce que cela ferait mauvais genre auprès de vos confrères ? Ou pour ne pas froisser l’extrême droite politique et médiatique qui, depuis le 6 novembre, vous soutient inconditionnellement comme elle a soutenu la politique génocidaire ?

Renoncez donc à vos valeurs humanistes de pacotille et assumez l’agenda réactionnaire que vous avez décidé d’endosser en ouvrant les portes de votre institution à celles et ceux qui nient la valeur des vies palestiniennes et le droit international. Vos mensonges se poursuivent car non, cette institution n’est plus la nôtre. Vous l’avez livrée au fascisme qui ronge le monde, vous en avez fait l’étendard de la déshumanisation, la normalisation des heures les plus sombres de notre présent. Vous n’avez jamais souhaité nous écouter lorsque nous vous avons alerté. Vous faites la sourde oreille au bruit des bombes lorsqu’elles explosent sur Gaza en tuant par milliers hommes, femmes et enfants, mais vous ouvrez votre scène à celles et ceux qui les lancent là-bas, mais aussi au Qatar, en Iran, au Yémen, au Liban et en Syrie.

À quoi s’attendre pour les concerts des 30 novembre et 16 janvier prochains ? À une Philharmonie aux allures de bunker, nouveau fief des forces de l’ordre et de la répression dans le 19e arrondissement de Paris ? À une réunion au sommet des institutions et associations négationnistes du génocide en cours et qui, par le pire travers antisémite qui consiste à associer toustes les Juif.ve.s du monde à l’état d’Israël, instrumentalisent l’histoire et la culture juive à des fins guerrières ?  Si vous n’entendez pas les souffrances des Palestinien.ne.s avez vous au moins compris celles de vos salarié.e.s et des mélomanes que vous traînez dans votre complicité outrageante ?

Au nom de la musique que nous défendons, au nom de l’humanité que nous incarnons et puisqu’il s’agirait encore selon vous de notre institution, nous vous exhortons à cesser toute collaboration avec les institutions culturelles et académiques israéliennes qui lavent les mains des génocidaires. Après vous avoir invité cordialement à envisager l’annulation des venues de Lahav Shani et du Jerusalem Quartet, nous vous l’exigeons. Et malgré vos habitudes policières prises le 6 novembre dernier, nos revendications et surtout les voix palestiniennes dont nous nous faisons le relais ne souffriront aucune de vos répressions. Enfin, dans le doute que tout cela soit entendu il nous faudra constater que vous n’avez pas été à la hauteur de vos fonctions d’un point de vue politique et moral et qu’il nous semblera justifié d’exiger votre démission au nom de la dignité des victimes d’un génocide que vous avez décidé de normaliser. L’histoire finira par juger les auteur.ice.s du génocide et leurs complices. À ce jour, vous êtes sur le banc des accusés.

Tahia Falestine !

Artistes pour la Palestine - France
Palestine Action
Union Juive Française pour la Paix
Tsedek
Culture en luttes

On Sunday, November 30, 2025, the Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra will give a concert at the Philharmonie de Paris (Cité de la Musique) under the baton of its music director Lahav Shani, who is also music director of the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra and will be music director of the Munich Philharmonic Orchestra from September 2026. A previous concert given on November 6 at the same venue by the Israel Symphony Orchestra under the same conductor was the scene of incidents, following which four pro-Palestinian protesters were charged and in turn filed various complaints for assault and violation of the secrecy of the investigation. Several organizations have just sent the letter below to the director of the Philharmonic. -Tlaxcala

Thursday, 27 November 2025

Sir,

Since the beginning of the genocide in Gaza, nearly 70,000 people have been killed—men, women, and children included. Still in Gaza, 345 people have been killed and 889 injured by the Israeli army since the so-called “ceasefire” came into effect on October 11, a ceasefire that has been violated more than 500 times. In two years, the equivalent of six Hiroshima bombs has been dropped on a territory barely 150 square kilometers in size. Humanitarian and medical aid remains blocked while, with winter approaching, epidemics are preparing to follow in the footsteps of famine. Every day, bodies pile up—when they have the “luck” of being found. On Monday, November 24, armed Israeli militias forced children out of the Palestinian National Theatre (El-Hakawati Theatre) in occupied Jerusalem. These weapons will certainly attract less attention than a few harmless smoke flares raised in front of the cultural ambassadors of the State of Israel.

The genocide—characterized as such by the relevant international legal bodies—continues before our eyes. And you, what are you doing?

Not only have you invited the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra (IPO) and its principal conductor, official ambassadors of a colonial state in the midst of committing genocide; not only have you welcomed musicians who relay the dehumanization of Palestinians through reprehensible disinformation on their social media—for instance, Eleonora Lutsky speaking of “Hamaswood,” or Kirill Mihanovsky referring to Palestinians as “monstrous neighbors”; not only have you taken peaceful activists to court for calling for the legitimate boycott of Israeli cultural institutions that participate in the normalization of genocide—you have chosen to plunge your institution deeper into falsehood, hoping never to have to assume your responsibilities before history and before justice.
You lied to your employees during an extraordinary general assembly, describing peaceful activists as violent, ignoring the racist and homophobic insults from part of the audience, and claiming you did not know the orchestra would play the Israeli anthem even though they perform it regularly on tour. Yes—the anthem was not played in response to the action of our comrades; it was a premeditated act.

You were cordially invited—considering the Palestinian calls and in accordance with international law—to cancel the appearances of Lahav Shani, the IPO, and the Jerusalem Quartet due to the institutional role they play in the cultural whitewashing of the crime of genocide committed by Israel. To these calls you again responded with falsehoods and with the blatant instrumentalization of Palestinian artists programmed in your institution, using them to justify your collaboration with the cultural institutions of a genocidal state.
This Tuesday, November 25, you chose to fully assume this political agenda and drag your entire institution into the propaganda narrative by agreeing to Lahav Shani’s request to address your employees. His “explanation” was nothing more than a renewed condemnation, describing peaceful protest as an “armed attack” against Israeli identity. Yet every call to boycott you received was very clear: “We are not calling for a boycott of artists because of their Israeli nationality, but because of their institutional participation in the erasure of Palestinian lives orchestrated by the Israeli state.”
You impose propaganda—hasbara—on your employees through these explanations, while refusing dialogue with those who have been warning you from the start about this complicity with the worst. This is your way of silencing Palestinian voices.

Hiding behind the supposed apolitical nature of classical music was already an outrage given the suffering endured by Palestinians over the past two years and in the face of international law. After such relentless efforts to maintain collaboration with the ambassadors of genocide—calling disproportionately on police and judicial force—were we to hope you might come to your senses?
Today you are ready to excuse an affront to human dignity and to international law—just like the anthem of the genocidal state that resounded within your walls. And why? To avoid risking the cancellation of a concert with Martha Argerich because it would look bad among your peers? Or to avoid offending the far-right political and media forces that have supported you unconditionally since November 6, just as they support genocidal policy?

Cast aside your sham humanist values and assume the reactionary agenda you have chosen to adopt by opening your institution’s doors to those who deny the value of Palestinian lives and international law. Your lies continue, because no—this institution is no longer ours. You have handed it over to the fascism eating away at the world; you have made it a banner of dehumanization and the normalization of the darkest hours of our present. You never wished to hear us when we warned you. You turn a deaf ear to the sound of bombs exploding over Gaza, killing thousands of men, women, and children, but you open your stage to those who drop them there—and in Qatar, Iran, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria as well.

What are we to expect for the concerts of November 30 and January 16? A Philharmonie turned into a bunker, new stronghold of law enforcement and repression in Paris’s 19th arrondissement? A summit of institutions and associations denying the ongoing genocide and—through the very worst form of antisemitism, which consists of conflating all Jews worldwide with the State of Israel—instrumentalizing Jewish history and culture for warlike purposes?
If you cannot hear the suffering of Palestinians, have you at least understood that of your employees and of the music-lovers you are dragging into your outrageous complicity?

In the name of the music we defend, in the name of the humanity we embody, and since this is supposedly still our institution according to you, we call on you to cease all collaboration with Israeli cultural and academic institutions that wash the hands of the perpetrators of genocide.
After having cordially invited you to consider cancelling the appearances of Lahav Shani and the Jerusalem Quartet, we now demand it. And despite the policing habits you embraced on November 6, our demands—and above all the Palestinian voices we relay—will not tolerate any repression from you.
Finally, should all this go unheard, we will be forced to acknowledge that you have failed to meet the political and moral responsibilities of your position, and it will seem justified to demand your resignation in the name of the dignity of the victims of a genocide you have chosen to normalize.
History will judge the perpetrators of genocide and their accomplices. As of today, you sit on the defendants’ bench.

Tahia Falestine!

Artistes pour la Palestine - France
Palestine Action
Union Juive Française pour la Paix
Tsedek
Culture en lutte

 

On November 12, 2025, Aysam Jihan Ma’alla died in the West Bank. He was 13 years old
Testimony from a volunteer during the olive harvest in the West Bank

Anna Haunimat, 17/11/2025

Translated by Tlaxcala

Aysam, who had been in a coma for a month, died as a result of an attack by Israeli settlers and the intervention of the Israeli army using tear gas in Beita. Aysam Jihad Ma’alla was 13 years old; he was helping his family harvest olives alongside other farming families. He was not in Gaza. He was in Zone B in the West Bank, an area that was supposed to be fully returned to the Palestinians five years after the Oslo Accords (1993), but which remains under the civil control of the Palestinian Authority and the military control of the occupying forces.

“Geography is destiny”
—Ibn Khaldun

I left at the beginning of October 2025 for the West Bank to take part in the Harvest Zeytoun campaign with UAWC (Union of Agricultural Work Committees). The UAWC, headquartered in Ramallah, is an organisation that supports farmers in the West Bank. It was founded in 1986 and is affiliated with Via Campesina.

This Harvest Campaign has been renewed for several years and

aims to enable Palestinian families to secure their olive harvests thanks to the presence of international volunteers in the face of continuous attacks from Israeli settlers. “BAQA” (بقاء) — an Arabic word meaning “to stay” — symbolising steadfastness, rootedness, and resistance in the face of occupation and settler violence, is the name given to this campaign.

These attacks aim first and foremost to terrorise Palestinian farming families, preventing them from harvesting olives and pushing them to abandon their land. An “Israeli law” states that land not cultivated for two years is transferred to the occupying forces (+ 5,200 hectares confiscated by Israel between 08/10/2023 and 08/08/2025). The aim is also to make these lands unusable, in this case, the olive groves. Centuries-old olive trees or newly planted ones are uprooted and burned by settlers.


Violent and daily attacks by settlers against Palestinian families have intensified over the past three years (3,041 incidents, including 150 fatal ones, between 8/10/2023 and 8/08/2025).
52,300 olive trees have been destroyed in Gaza and the West Bank since 7 October 2023.
On 16/11/2025, according to the official Palestinian news agency WAFA, Ibrahim al-Hamed, Director General of Agriculture in Salfit, stated that 135 olive trees, at least seven years old and belonging to three farmers, had been uprooted in the Qana Valley within the locality of Deir Istiya. In the first eight months of 2025, the Israeli army issued orders to cut down trees over an area of 681 hectares in the occupied Palestinian territories. The October report from the Council on Israeli Violations indicates that, with the support of the Israeli army, settlers uprooted or damaged 1,200 olive trees on Palestinian land. [source]

The almost systematic destruction of olive trees by settlers deprives Palestinians of one of their essential resources. But it also contributes — since the establishment of the Zionist project in Palestine — to the fabrication of a myth: a land without people, an empty land. Since 1948, erasing all traces of prior presence has been a constant (nearly 500 villages were razed in 1948, 780,000 people expelled from their lands, without the right of return).

We volunteers, who set out hoping to try to slow this infernal machine of destruction, left every morning in small groups to help families with the harvest. Days without settler intervention forcing us to abandon the olive groves were rare. But when it was possible, it was a celebration! Finishing the harvest, eating together, sometimes even dancing.


But often too, we had to work quickly and in silence, like little ants trying to elude the settlers’ vigilance and finish before their attacks. On Thursday 16 November, we went to an olive grove near Huwara with a municipal councillor; once again we were attacked and chased away by settlers and the army. We then moved to another olive grove at the entrance to Burin, located right by the roadside, opposite the owner’s house. The army arrived very quickly and ordered us to leave, which we did, and we went to the farmer’s house, where he offered us coffee, tea, and pastries. The army entered his courtyard, claiming that we had violated a military zone.

After an hour, the army returned with a map indicating that this olive grove — including the farmer’s house — had been declared a military zone that very morning. This map, produced after a short while, showed how colonisation advances quietly: declaring land as military zones, confiscation, dispossession, and then the establishment of settlers on that same land.


During the absurd discussions with the army, I spoke with the owner and his wife. Seeing her embroidered headband and admiring its beauty, she called her daughters. They arrived with magnificent embroidered dresses, a belt embroidered with the names of Palestinian cities, and showed us the website of their shop filled with beautiful embroidered garments. 

We were “talking clothes,” in a sense, while the army penned us in their courtyard. She explained: “For us, this is every day. They enter, search the house claiming we are terrorists, sometimes arrest us. We can live with everyone — Christians, Jews, Muslims — but them, no, they don’t want to. They want to be alone on our land, that’s why they chase us away.” Then the police arrived; we were taken away after being thoroughly filmed by a settler, the army, and the police. I hugged tightly these women who embroider their history. In the bus, a female soldier explained that this woman was a terrorist, that I had hugged a terrorist, that her whole family was, including the little boy who had served us coffee and tea and taken care of us. Then I joined my comrades on the bus; the owner and another farmer were also arrested. That bus ultimately took us — after three interrogations, fingerprinting, photographs, a trip to the Jordanian border, a stop at border police, and finally to Givon prison — from which we were only released on Tuesday 21 October in the morning, accused of violating a military zone, participating in a terrorist group, and disturbing public order. We later learned the two farmers were also released the same day, though we never knew where they had been held.


If this is indeed an economic strategy to suffocate the Palestinian economy in the West Bank, it is just as much about fuelling the historical lie forged by Zionism and its Western allies: “Palestine was a desert; we made it a garden.” The reality is quite different: instead of an orchard, they have made it a hell.


The luminous landscapes, orchards, terraced fields with dry-stone walls cover the hills and valleys and their inhabitants. In the Qana Valley, for example, one reaches the olive groves by a stony path (because the road is forbidden by the settlers), walking through fields of orange, lemon, and pomegranate trees, and beehives, where a few goat herds still pass.



A farmer from the Palestinian Communist Party whom we helped with the olive harvest pointed to a stone house on the opposite hillside where he lived before 1967, the date of the Israeli occupation forces’ invasion. He explained that before the invasion he held a Jordanian identity card because the territory was under Jordanian mandate. It was confiscated by the occupation forces on the day of the invasion. “Jordan fought for one day,” he told us, “then they left and abandoned us under Israeli bombardment.” Since then, the settlements have multiplied, and “we live under the permanent threat of the settlers,” he said, pointing to the buildings that cover the hilltops, spreading like a gangrene impossible to eliminate.

I was in the olive groves in Beita on 10 October, alongside Palestinian families and dozens of other international volunteers. I witnessed one of these attacks. So I write now in urgency so that Aysam’s death at 13 years old does not become just another number added to an endless list. It will not be the last, I know. Others have already died since. Other Palestinians will continue to die under settler attacks and interventions by the occupying armed forces. And other Palestinians will remain on their land, as they have done for millennia.


During these attacks, in a brief lull, I kept helping a Palestinian family gather olives, putting them into sacks, talking with a woman. I asked her in rudimentary English what she thought of the ceasefire in Gaza. After laughing and saying, “Your English is broken!”, she calmly continued picking olives and said: “They have never respected a single agreement; they will not respect this one.” Then the settlers attacked again. This time, more numerous, more violent. They came charging down the hills screaming, stoning, shooting, burning cars. Children were shouting “Allahu Akbar!” and their voices echoed from hill to hill, as if their cries could push back the savagery in which they were born.

Cries against massacres, cries to protect their land, their brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers. Cries to defend themselves from a barbarism which, since 1948, has taken their families, homes, harvests, engulfed their land, and spewed death under the indifferent, sometimes falsely embarrassed, often accusatory gaze of Western eyes urging them to be silent, to disappear quietly, silently, above all.

As soon as the settlers began running down the hills, the army — which had positioned itself between the settlers and us — immediately fired tear gas at us.


Aysam inhaled the gas. It killed him.

The Palestinians, trying to protect us, asked us to withdraw. Hastily gathering a few more olives and filling a few more sacks, we began to leave — reluctantly, but we did. As we left, and as a fellow volunteer told me, “We are leaving; they remain,” rickety cars full of Palestinians arrived, trying to slow the frenzied settler attacks.

That day, settlers burned about ten cars, overturned an ambulance, and injured more than 35 people, including a Palestinian photojournalist and AFP correspondent [[Jaafar Ashtiyeh]. So I am writing now, to tell a little of what I saw — after many others, certainly — because yes, even if all this changes nothing, “something will have to be done,” as Éric Vuillard put it in a recent book.


Aysam was 13 years old. He is already no longer the last victim of the atrocities committed by a criminal state conceived by states born of genocide and/or complicit in them for centuries. But he will also be part of a long list of faces, of lives that do not give in, that refuse to surrender, that do not sell out, that continue to shout to the world that they will live. That the olive trees will bloom again, that the harvest will be beautiful, and that the oil will be green and bright like the land that produced it.


May these words be as many indelible stains, blood red, tattooed on the disdainful, still haughty, and inhuman foreheads of the genocidaires and their accomplices around the world.

 

20/11/2025

Colonel Wilkerson: “Israel Is Behind Trump’s Escalation on Venezuela”


India & Global Left, 15/11/2025

Transcribed and summarized by Tlaxcala

Wilkerson explains why the U.S. is escalating against Venezuela, how close Washington is to a possible military intervention, and why he believes Israel is playing a driving role behind Trump’s Venezuela strategy. We also explore bigger geopolitical questions: • Does the U.S. have a real grand strategy after losing the tariff war to China? • Will NATO retreat from its failing venture in Ukraine? • What does Syria’s effective re-absorption into the U.S. Middle East architecture mean for the region? • Is Washington reacting to global shifts—or blindly escalating on multiple fronts? If you want a deep dive into U.S. empire, great-power competition, and the hidden actors shaping today’s conflicts, this interview with Colonel Wilkerson is essential.

 

The episode opens with a welcome to viewers and an appeal to support the channel through subscriptions, membership, or donations. The host then introduces the evening’s guest, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, a retired U.S. Army Colonel and former Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell. The conversation begins with an overview of U.S. escalation against Venezuela, including military buildups in the Caribbean, operations originating from Puerto Rico under the banner of a so-called "war on narco-terrorism," and intensified propaganda efforts. Figures in the Venezuelan opposition—such as María Corina Machado—are described as promising Venezuelan assets to U.S. corporations, while President Trump has been explicit in seeking regime change in Caracas. The central question posed to Wilkerson is how far Washington is willing to go.

Wilkerson responds by recalling his experience during the George W. Bush administration, noting that many of the practices of that era are now being repeated with even greater depth, breadth, and illegality. He invokes the legacy of the Nuremberg Trials, reminding viewers that their primary purpose—articulated by Justice Jackson—was to stop wars of aggression. This principle formed the moral foundation for the UN and the Geneva Conventions of 1948, which sought to impose standards on the conduct of war and establish international criminal law. According to Wilkerson, the United States is now dismantling, "peg by peg, thread by thread," the entire post-World War II international legal framework. He argues that the U.S. has become the world’s chief perpetrator of wars of aggression, with Venezuela being the most recent target.

Wilkerson explains that U.S. covert involvement in Venezuela escalated in 2016 when Trump signed a presidential finding authorizing CIA operations on the ground. Obama’s 2015 declaration that Venezuela was a national security threat to the United States also paved the way for sanctions and interventionist policies. Wilkerson stresses that both Democratic and Republican administrations have followed the same trajectory. He highlights a troubling trend: the creation of new legal rationales by the Department of Justice to justify extrajudicial killings at sea—killings that have already claimed dozens of lives, including impoverished fishermen misidentified as smugglers. People in Colombia and Venezuela are now reportedly afraid to fish for fear of being killed. This, Wilkerson says, represents the destruction of international law and due process.

Turning to the possibility of a military intervention, Wilkerson describes the situation as deeply alarming. He asserts that Israel is heavily involved in U.S. intelligence operations related to Venezuela, having participated since at least 2016. According to him, Trump receives misleading or manipulated intelligence not from official U.S. agencies but from intermediaries such as Laura Loomer and figures connected to the Israeli intelligence apparatus, financed by actors within the Venezuelan opposition. In Wilkerson’s view, this intelligence pipeline circumvents the established intelligence community, enabling operations driven by external agendas.

He elaborates on the rise of U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM), which has grown into a powerful, semi-autonomous military structure closely integrated with the CIA. This arrangement allows the CIA to conduct direct-action operations while avoiding congressional oversight, since the military technically carries out the actions. Wilkerson provides historical examples—from Mogadishu to Afghanistan and Iraq—where Special Operations forces conducted unilateral missions without the knowledge of regional commanders. He argues that similar dynamics are now visible in Venezuela, where special operations personnel aboard a “mother ship” off the Venezuelan coast conduct clandestine missions without the awareness or approval of the conventional military command at Southern Command. This, he says, represents an “unbelievable” and dangerous breakdown of civilian and military oversight.

Argentina, laboratory and mirror of the world
How to transform a carnivorous people into transgenic vegans

Version française Versión española Versão portuguesa

Until 1948, the ‘Argentine’ metro station in Paris was called Obligado, commemorating Argentina’s victory on November 20, 1845, when the Argentine Confederation inflicted a decisive defeat on Anglo-French forces at Vuelta de Obligado on the Paraná River. Made a public holiday under the name National Sovereignty Day in 1974, November 20 was moved this year to November 24 to allow for a long weekend from the 21st to the 24th, a gift from the Milei government to the hospitality industry. To mark the occasion, we are publishing a short book that explains how badly Argentina’s “national sovereignty” is in shape. Presentation below.

“ In the richest territory on earth lives a poor, malnourished people with starvation wages. Until we Argentines recover control of our wealth for the nation and the people, we will not be a sovereign nation or a happy people. ”

Arturo Jauretche (1901-74)

This collection includes three articles published in October and November 2025 on the decline and challenges of the catastrophic crisis affecting Argentina, a country that was the “breadbasket of the world” in the last century and has now become the world’s genetically modified waste dump. About 18 million hectares (with annual variations) – half of the land dedicated to “major crops” – are devoted to the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans, a truly diabolical cereal that now “feeds” not only the cows and pigs of half the planet, starting with China and Israel, but also the children in schools from the Rio de la Plata to Tierra del Fuego.

Argentines, the world’s largest consumers of meat after Americans, can no longer afford the meat they love so much for their asados, the South American version of barbecue or meshwi. Seven out of ten Argentine children have nothing to eat. Javier Milei, the man with the chainsaw, is not solely responsible for this catastrophe; he is merely the executor of dirty tasks, serving the Yankees and their cronies at the World Bank and the IMF. The Chinese play a not insignificant role in the bluffing game that is played at the expense of the poor and impoverished. They took Comrade Deng Xiaoping’s motto literally: “It doesn’t matter if the cat is black or white, the essential thing is that it catches mice.” We are all potential Argentine mice. Read and you will understand.

SUMMARY

  1. Argentina: Laboratory of Poverty under American Tutelage

  2. The Soy War: Anatomy of a Seed
    How soy, between China, the United States and Brazil, became the hidden nerve of global trade

  3. The Seed, The Beast, and The Debt
    Argentina, its soybeans, meat, and debt in the new global food order

Download the book

09/11/2025

Jaafar Ashtiyeh: This Palestinian Photojournalist Has Long Documented Israeli Violence. This Time, It Nearly Killed Him

 


Ashtiyeh. "I'm the most active and veteran photographer in the West Bank and I've never faced dangers like this." Photo Alex Levac

Jaafar Ashtiyeh, an acclaimed West Bank press photographer, has been wounded frequently in the course of his work. But nothing prepared him for what settlers did to him


Gideon Levy & Jaafar Ashtiyeh / AFP (photos), Haaretz, 8/11/2025

 

Jaafar Ashtiyeh has seen and photographed the final expressions of innumerable people drawing their last breath. He will never forget them. In the course of nearly 30 years of work as a photographer for the French news agency AFP in the West Bank, he has captured thousands of images of sadness, of human suffering, of death, of peace, of hope, of victory, even of happiness.

 

It's hard for him to choose which of them best encapsulates his life's work. But when pressed, he finally chooses choose one – of an elderly woman hugging the trunk of an olive tree – which he took in 2006 and has since become iconic.

 

This veteran war photographer has documented virtually everything that has happened in the occupied and suffocated West Bank in recent decades. About a month ago, while documenting Palestinians harvesting their olive crop, he was attacked by a gang of violent settlers. They set his car afire before his eyes, and if he hadn't run for his life he's certain they would have killed him.

 

We met last week in a café in the town of Huwara, near Nablus, not far from the scene of the crime: groves owned by inhabitants of the village of Beita. Ashtiyeh doesn't have a new car yet and he's barely gone back to work since the assault. Signs of shock, of the consequences of the attack and above all of helplessness he feels are still visible even on this warhorse.


Jaafar Ashtiyeh's car burns in the village of Beita on October 10. He's "not for or against anyone," he says. His job, he explains, has always been simply to take pictures. "Some soldiers understood that – others called us terrorists." 

 

He was born 57 years ago in the village of Salem, not far from Nablus, and still lives there with his family. For a few years he served as deputy head of the local council on a volunteer basis. Since coming of age, he has never been arrested or gotten into trouble with the Israeli security forces. As a photographer for an international news agency, he says, he maintains neutrality.

 

Ashtiyeh never studied photography – he studied economics in a Nablus college – but in 1996 started to work for AFP. He had rented a camera and photographed scenes at Joseph's Tomb. The prestigious agency published the shots and he has been employed there ever since. The BBC once chose one of his pictures as photograph of the year.