Khaza Mokhammed (1989) is a Russian linguist, PhD in Classics Romance philology from Moscow Region State University, author of many articles in Russian language on middle french Grammar and Latin language.
“History is not the soil in which happiness grows. The periods of happiness in it are the blank pages of history”- Hegel
A brief Marxist Leninist analysis of western imperialism
To understand the Marxist approach to the question of imperialism, unfortunately, it is not enough to read Lenin's work ‘Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism’. For all the importance of this book, it actually has a rather narrow subject matter. Lenin's goal, as can be seen from the text of this book, was to analyse from a Marxist standpoint how imperialism differs from the pre-imperialist stage in the development of capitalism, to show the decadent, reactionary character of imperialism as a stage in the decay of capitalism, and to criticize opportunist tendencies in the analysis of imperialism (in particular, Kautsky's theory). But there is no complete description of imperialism as a world system from the point of view of Marxist political economy in the book, although Lenin, of course, proceeds from the fact that imperialism is a world system. And if you pay attention to some of his later texts and speeches, it becomes clear that Lenin still had a much deeper and more holistic understanding of imperialism than he presented in this book.
An attempt to give a large-scale analysis of world imperialism as a whole with its internal laws was made by Rosa Luxemburg in her book ‘The Accumulation of Capital’, but this attempt was unsuccessful, and Rosa's theory turned out to be completely false.
The western imperialism would invade a sovereign nation, overthrow its legitimate government under the pretext of democracy, turn great civilizations into rubble as in the case of Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yugoslavia.
Western Imperialism and Nazism
In 1934, the Poles signed a non-aggression pact with the Germans. The Declaration was Hitler's first foreign policy success, which secured the eastern borders and allowed him to focus on expanding the western ones.
Polish leader Jozef Pilsudski and German propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels
The Polish leadership hoped to make friends with an aggressive neighbour and found common interests in the division of Czechoslovakia. However, neither the non-aggression pact nor the alliance with England and France helped the Poles: on April 28, 1939, Germany broke the agreement, and on September 1, Great Britain declared war. The Anglo-German Naval Agreement, signed in 1935, allowed Germany to acquire a navy. Prior to that, it was banned due to defeat in the First World War. As a result of the negotiations, the British allowed Hitler to build 5 battleships, 2 aircraft carriers, 21 cruisers and 64 destroyers. These forces equalized the Nazi state with Italy and France, and also gave an advantage over the naval forces of the USSR.
The Modern Nazism
The fact that Ukraine,
in the three and a half years after the Maidan, has turned into a country of
victorious surrealism, where the level of lawlessness has been elevated to the
rank of state madness, is clear today, probably, to any sane person.
In fact, Ukraine today is a country where people are in power who preach this
disgusting misanthropic ideology quite openly. Moreover, they even seem to take
credit for it.
Europe does not care about the “reincarnation” modern Neo Nazis in Ukraine. Doesn’t condemn torchlight processions under banners with swastikas… State terror Desecration of graves and monuments doesn’t hold the Neo Nazis accountable – for burning people in the Odessa House of Trade Unions shelling of Donbass and political assassinations.
Former U.S. senator John McCain With the Ukrainian Neo Nazis
Today it is hidden behind the sign of freedom fighters supported by pro-Western oligarchs and the Western “democratic community”. the Western media went too far by presenting the Neo-Nazi as “peaceful resistance”.
Under similar circumstances, Adolf Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, democratically, with the support of the people. With the support of the German magnates and the pro-fascist part of the elites of the West. Pro-fascist propaganda then presented the Nazis as “part of the people,” and part of the people really believed that the Nazis were some kind of special nationalists.
Another important reason: for the West, the Bandera people are “their own” fascists, Eurofascists, they nurtured them with grants and helped them as instructors, they have long been making them a battering ram against Eastern Ukraine and Russia.
However
there is another, and fundamental, reason why the West supported German
fascism, and today supports Banderites. The essence of the ideology of the West
in relation to the outside world (and its inner, white and fluffy side is of no
interest to us in this case) is the ideology of superiority, “exclusiveness”,
in the language of official American propaganda, today - due to the superiority
of everything in the world of “Western democracy”. This is the ideology of “good
with the Colt, which is better than just good”, in terms of Hollywood images,
or the ideology of James Bond “with licence to kill” for higher and humane
Western purposes, in the words of English cinema and adventure literature. In
other words, it is part of the Western mentality.
In politics, this is hidden behind the “double standards” metaphor, in
principle, this wording includes everything, along with fascism. The essence of
fascism is also an ideology of superiority, only in an extreme, racist form. It
is an ideology of exclusiveness taken to the racial limit.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire