TIGRILLO L. ANUDOThe Flotillas That Are Kidnapped Every Day

Tigrillo L. Anudo, October 6, 2025
Translated by Tlaxcala

Español Français Italiano عربية

The world changes little. Historical patterns repeat themselves. The past never left. The objectification of human beings continues. Colonization is the order of the day. Piracy in international waters is revived with other actors (who finally kept the aid and belongings of the occupants of the humanitarian flotilla bound for Gaza?). Those who undertake actions in favor of justice are labeled “terrorists.”

The hijacking of the Global Sumud Flotilla, which was carrying humanitarian aid to the tormented people of Gaza, is what happens every day in many countries. It is happening right now in Ecuador, Peru, Argentina, where neoliberal policies subject the population to hunger, lack of healthcare, education, housing, employment — to a slow death.

The difference is that these are not flotillas traveling by sea. They are flotillas of social investment, which remain kidnapped in plutocratic and corrupt Congresses and Assemblies. The difference lies in the fact that this practice of global capitalism becomes more visible in a nation invaded, massacred, and humiliated by Zionist ideology, the conception of a supremacist State that carries out ethnic cleansing against those it considers “inferior” and “terrorists.”

In the countries mentioned, the human rights of other ethnic groups (indigenous peoples, Afro-descendants, peasants, mestizo workers) are kidnapped; repressive and anti-democratic dictatorial regimes operate there. They do not kill with bomber planes and artificial intelligence, but with the denial of human dignity — an ignominy made invisible by corporate media and educational apparatuses that program political illiterates.

Everything is interconnected. Daniel Noboa (President of Ecuador), Dina Boluarte (President of Peru), and Javier Milei (President of Argentina) are allies of the Zionist government of Netanyahu. Like them, Donald Trump (President of the United States) and other presidents of European nations have business interests and defend the Israeli regime. Although some European governments verbally rejected the terrorist actions of the Israeli State in Palestine (among them Italy and Spain), they ended up bowing their heads before the genocide. There is no integrity in their rejection. They are afraid to assume upright positions; they do not want to leave the Club of the world’s powerful accomplices.

The United States government follows Zionist ideology; it is its point of reference. It is the natural ally of those who embody the most characteristic features of capitalism 2.0: usury, control of banking and the financial system, management of the most lucrative industries, production of weapons and surveillance technologies, espionage services and techniques for combating “internal enemies,” developments in artificial intelligence that increase labor exploitation and unemployment. Capitalism 2.0 advances technology and diminishes humanity.

Israel teaches the United States how to do business, involving it as a partner in an ambitious hotel project on Palestinian territory. Neither International Law nor Human Rights stop the rate of profit. The elitist political world continues, for the most part, to be very permissive toward the genocide in Gaza. It suits them. Invisible threads of commercial and diplomatic interests predominate in the agenda of foreign policy. Political economy prevails, not ethics nor international solidarity.

Not even the dystopian novels of the 20th century foresaw the negative utopia the world lives in today. A small country with a powerful army, backed by the U.S. empire, “defends” its right to commit genocide. Furthermore, it considers the act of bringing food, water, medicine, and other humanitarian aid to a besieged people as terrorist acts financed by Hamas. It grants itself permission to impose a maritime blockade on the Gaza Strip (for 17 years), subjecting it to thirst, hunger, and lack of medicine. It also allows itself to violate the right to the sea by boarding vessels in international waters.
Who cares about Palestine?

How to confront the danger posed by Israel’s State terrorism? Marches and humanitarian flotillas are more symbolic than effective. However, they are valuable and must continue because they make visible the infamous offensive of a machine that kills children and women. There are also boycott campaigns against companies that finance the terrorism of the Zionist army. Their reach is limited, but they add to the cry for peace. President Petro proposed an Army of Salvation of Humanity, but there was no timely response to make it a reality. President Trump announced a recolonizing “Peace Plan” to stop the “war” (he does not say genocide) and administer the Gaza Strip with Tony Blair (killer of Asians). A deception and mockery of the world. They cancel the self-determination of peoples with a stroke of the pen; they decide for Palestine.

Ahmed Rahma, Türkiye

Everything indicates that the disorder that destroys International Law can only be compensated by the use of force by new and daring actors. The Houthis of Yemen, a poor country devastated by war, have dared to launch drones and missiles at Israel; they do so out of solidarity with Palestine, to make themselves felt as a neglected and beaten nation, for historical-religious motives, for strategy, political calculation, and because they have the dignity and courage that rich nations lack. These actions, along with the supersonic missile responses from Iran that shattered Israel’s Iron Dome, are encouraging other countries to intervene to stop the massacres committed daily with impunity by the fanatical soldiers led by Netanyahu. Israel is not so invulnerable; it has already been demonstrated. And a tiny country like Yemen understands that it can play a role by controlling the Red Sea, through which navigates a large part of the fuel and goods of international trade. In a world where the rules of coexistence and respect between nations are violated, the continuation of such violations by other interested parties is authorized. Israel is risking being erased from the map because of its persistent defiance of peace and international morality.

If the Israeli army arrogates to itself the right to kidnap ships in international waters, it is validating the Houthis attacking ships carrying weapons, goods, or fuel through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the southern entrance to the Red Sea, through which pass ships loaded with oil that supply not only Israel but also Europe and the United States. The ships of this last country will also suffer. Oil prices may rise. The world economy could be affected. The law of the jungle is expanding across the planet; an uncertain future could mark international relations.

The dispute over markets and global trade routes is a chessboard for Russia, China, Europe, and the United States. None of them cares about the fate of Palestine. They are concerned with how they position themselves against their rivals. Each time a new war front opens for the U.S., Russians and Chinese take advantage of it. They are interested in seeing the U.S. exhausted by helping its Israeli partners. Hence, bears and dragons do not enter energetically to defend Palestine. That is how political economy works. Small countries like Yemen and Lebanon (Hezbollah) do more for Gazans than the great powers. Arab governments also fail to agree on how to support their Palestinian brothers or how to confront the Zionist challenge.

Only the peoples save the peoples. Other initiatives will be indispensable to halt the genocide. There is no military power that saves lives in Gaza. No government dares to intercede for the massacred Palestinians. None wants to “get into trouble”; each one looks to its own interest. So far, only Indonesia has offered 20,000 soldiers for an improbable army of salvation. No one believes in armies of salvation.

Gaza is alone. Its inhabitants continue to fall under the murderous bullets of Netanyahu. After Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Palestinian genocide is the greatest failure of humanity.
The Zionist leadership is determined to exterminate the people of Gaza. It has been doing so since 1947, when its British partners deliberately settled them in Palestinian territory.
Their hatred and fear (lack of love) have led them to consider all Palestinians as terrorists.
They say the same about those who try to bring them aid.
Fascism is reigning, and we have not realized it.

JORGE MAJFUDThe Peace Agreements of the Addicted White Man

Jorge Majfud for La Pluma y Tlaxcala, Oct. 5, 2025

Translated by Tlaxcala

On September 29, 2025, The New York Times reported on the meeting at the White House between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. under this headline with a clarifying subtitle:

Cease-fire…It is not that history rhymes—it repeats itself.
Since the fifteenth century, all the treaties signed by the European empires have been made at gunpoint and systematically ignored once they stopped serving their purposes or when they managed to push forward their lines of fire.
Destruction and dispossession were always seasoned with some noble cause: civilization, freedom, democracy, and the invader’s right to defend himself.

For centuries, it was the same story repeated in the diplomacy between Indigenous peoples and white settlers—no different from the most recent case of the “Peace Agreement” proposed and imposed under threat by Washington and Tel Aviv on Palestine.
It is the same history of the violation of every peace treaty signed with the Native Nations on either side of the Appalachians, before and after 1776.
Later, what historians call the “Louisiana Purchase” (1803) was not a purchase at all, but a brutal dispossession of the Indigenous nations who were the ancestral owners of that territory, as large as the entire rising Anglo country in America.
No Native person was invited to the negotiating table in Paris, far from those being dispossessed.
And when one of these agreements included some “representative” of the attacked peoples—as in the 1835 Cherokee Treaty—the representative was false, a Guaidó invented by the white settlers.

The same occurred with the transfer of Spain’s last colonies (Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Guam) to the United States.
While hundreds of Sioux dyed the snows of Dakota red demanding payment according to the treaty that had forced them to sell their lands, in Paris a new peace agreement was being signed over tropical peoples.
No representative of the dispossessed was invited to negotiate the accord that supposedly made their “liberation” possible.

For Theodore Roosevelt, “the most righteous of all wars is the war against savages… the only good Indians are dead Indians.”
Further south, he wrote and published that “Negroes are a stupid race.”
According to Roosevelt, democracy had been invented for the benefit of the white race, the only one capable of civilization and beauty.

During those years, the Anglo-Saxon ethnicity needed a justification for its brutality and its habit of stealing and then washing its crimes away with peace agreements imposed by force.
Since in the second half of the nineteenth century the epistemological paradigm of science had replaced religion, that justification became racial superiority.

Europe kept most of the world subjugated through its fanaticism and its addiction to gunpowder.
Theories about the superiority of the white man went hand in hand with his victimization: Blacks, Browns, Reds and Yellows took advantage of his generosity while threatening the minority of the superior race with replacement by the majority of inferior ones.
Sound familiar?

Because those biologicist theories were not sufficiently grounded, history was invoked instead.
At the end of the nineteenth century, Europe was teeming with linguistic and later anthropological theories about the pure origin of the noble race (Aryan, Iran), the white race derived from the Hindu Vedas.
These far-fetched stories—and Hindu symbols such as the Nazi swastika and what is now known as the Star of David (used by different cultures centuries earlier but originally from India)—became popular as racial symbols in print.

It is no coincidence that it was precisely at that moment that supremacist theories and Zionism were founded and articulated within their historical concepts in the white, racist, imperialist Europe of the North.
Even the founder of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, understood that Jews belonged to the superior “Aryan race.”

Until the Second World War, these supremacisms coexisted with certain frictions but not enough to prevent them from forming agreements, such as the Haavara Agreement between Nazis and Zionists, which for years transferred tens of thousands of white Jews (of “good genetic material”) to Palestine.
The first anti-Zionists were not the Palestinians who received them, but the European Jews who resisted that ethnic-cleansing agreement.
At the same time that the Palestinians were colonized and stripped of their lands, Judaism itself was colonized and stripped of its tradition.

When the Soviets crushed Hitler’s Nazis, being a supremacist became a disgrace.
Suddenly, Winston Churchill and the USAmerican millionaires stopped boasting of being Nazis.
Earlier, the 1917 Balfour-Rothschild Declaration had been an agreement among whites to divide and occupy a territory of “inferior races.”
As the racist and genocidal Churchill—then Minister of War—said:

“I am strongly in favor of using poisonous gas against uncivilized tribes.” [and he used it in Iraq, Transl. n.]

But the brutal irrationality of the Second World War also ended the Modern Era, founded on the paradigms of reason and progress.
Science and critical thought gave way to the irrationality of consumerism and religion.

Thus, today’s Zionists no longer insist before the UN or the White House on their Aryan racial superiority, but rather on their special rights as God’s chosen Semites.
Netanyahu and his evangelical escorts quote the biblical sacredness of Israel a thousand times, as if he and King David were the same person and as if that dark-skinned Semitic people of three thousand years ago were the same Khazars of the Caucasus who adopted Judaism in medieval Europe.

The Washington agreement between Trump and Netanyahu, to be accepted by the Palestinians, is illegitimate from the start.
It does not matter how many times the word peace is repeated—just as it does not matter how many times the word love is repeated while a woman is being raped.
It will always be a violation, just as Israel’s occupation and apartheid over Palestine are.

On Tuesday, September 30, U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth gathered his generals and quoted George Washington:

“He who desires peace must prepare for war,”
not because Washington “wanted war, but because it loved peace.”
President Trump concluded: it would be an insult to the United States if he were not awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

In 1933, in his speech before the Reichstag, the Nobel Peace Prize candidate Adolf Hitler declared that Germany sought only peace.
Three years later, after remilitarizing Rhineland, he insisted that Germany was a pacifist nation seeking its security.

Even if the new agreement between Washington and Tel Aviv is accepted by Hamas (one of Netanyahu’s own creations), sooner or later it will be violated by Tel Aviv.
For the superior race—for the chosen peoples—there are no agreements with inferior beings, only strategies of plunder and annihilation: strategies of demonizing the slave and the colonized, and of victimizing the poor white man, that addict to gunpowder—now to white powder.

BAHMAN KALBASIIn its statements, the US State Department is applying Israel’s positions Interview with Shahid Qureshi, fired for non-compliance

Bahman Kalbasi, BBC Persian, 17/9/2025

Bahman Kalbasi is the BBC Persian’s  correspondent at the United Nations in New York.

Translated by Tlaxcala

(Since Qureshi’s remarks in English were simultaneously translated into Farsi for broadcast, we have retranslated them into English from the Farsi version.)

 

Shahid Qureshi worked in the Bureau of Global Public Affairs of the US State Department and was recently dismissed from his job. Mr. Qureshi tells Bahman Kalbasi in a special interview program: Condolences to the families of Palestinian journalists killed by the Israeli army in Gaza and emphasizing USA’s opposition to ethnic cleansing in Gaza were positions that he intended to include in State Department statements according to the usual procedure, and this is why he was dismissed. In his first interview with a Persian-language media outlet after his dismissal from the US State Department, Mr. Qureshi talks about what happened and his experience working in different US administrations.

Bahman Kalbasi: In the months following Donald Trump’s return to the White House, pressure has increased on a number of activists and students opposed to Israel’s war in Gaza; from the administration’s efforts to deport some who were not U.S. citizens to firing others from their jobs. Shahid Qureshi worked in the public relations department of the U.S. State Department and was recently dismissed from his job. He had tried to include, based on the usual procedure, condolences to the families of Palestinian journalists killed by the Israeli military and opposition to ethnic cleansing in Gaza in the State Department’s statements. He says this is precisely why he was fired. This is his first interview with a Persian-language media outlet since his dismissal from the U.S. State Department, in which he talks about his experience in both the previous and current administrations, as well as what happened. I am Bahman Kalbasi , and I am speaking with this former U.S. State Department employee in a Special Dialogue.

 

Shahid Qureshi, thank you for the opportunity you’ve given BBC Persian. Before we get into the matter, could you talk a bit about yourself? Where were you born? Where did you grow up?

 

Shahid Qureshi: Yes, I was born in Seattle in 1991. For university, I studied International Relations at the University of Washington. My parents are from the city of Saveh in Iran and came to America around the time of the revolution. After getting my bachelor’s degree, I went to Washington D.C. and got my master’s degree in the same field, International Relations.

 

Bahman Kalbasi: How did you end up working for the U.S. State Department?

 

Shahid Qureshi: From a young age, and after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, I became sensitive to the endless wars the United States had become involved in. I felt that the image of Iraq formed in American public opinion before the invasion helped justify that operation. When we traveled to Iran to visit family and returned to America, seeing a similar negative image being formed about Iran worried me that what happened in Iraq could be repeated for Iran. 

That’s why I became very active in civil society organizations working to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and prevent its repetition in Iran. At the same time, working at the State Department was appealing to me as a diplomat, both to understand the forces that lead a country to war and to help find diplomatic paths for resolving disputes instead of war. I am very happy I was able to work there for a while.

 

Bahman Kalbasi : When you joined the U.S. State Department, what exactly did you do in your role in public relations? What were your duties?

 

GIDEON LEVYWhen Anas Al-Sharif Died, So Did Journalism, and So Did Truth and Solidarity

Israel's journalists refuse to see that a country that has killed more newspeople in this war in Gaza than have been killed in any other conflict in history will one day also turn its guns on them

A demonstrator holds a picture of Anas Al-Sharif, one of four Al Jazeera journalists killed in an Israeli strike days earlier, during a protest in solidarity with journalists in the Gaza Strip and condemning the recent strike, organised by journalists outside Egypt's Press Syndicate in Cairo on Wednesday.Credit: AFP/KHALED DESOUKI

Gideon Levy, Haaretz, Aug 13, 2025 11:37

"If these words of mine reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice. … God knows that I exerted every effort and strength I had to be a support and a voice for my people, from the moment I opened my eyes to life in the alleys and streets of the Jabalya refugee camp. My hope was that God would prolong my life until I could return with my family and loved ones to our original hometown, the occupied Al-Majdal Asqalan. But God's will prevailed, and His decree was fulfilled."

It was not God's will that determined the fate of journalist Anas Al-Sharif on Sunday, together with three other journalists and two civilians, in the press tent adjacent to Gaza City's al-Shifa Hospital. It was not the will of God, but rather a criminal Israeli military drone that targeted al-Sharif, Al Jazeera's most prominent correspondent in the war. Not God's will but rather Israel's will to execute him on the grounds that he had led a "Hamas cell," without presenting a shred of evidence to support this.

Many in the world believed the military's version, just as they had believed that the Israel Defense Forces did not kill Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh in Jenin in 2022. Even those who want to believe that Al-Sharif was a cell leader must ask: And what about the five people who were killed with him? Were they deputy heads of the cell? One cannot believe anything that is said by an army that massacres journalists so cold-bloodedly or a state that does not permit free coverage of the war, not even the stories about the head of the terror cell from Jabalya.

It is hard to believe – or perhaps nothing is hard to believe anymore – how little interest was shown here in the killing of four journalists. The Israeli press was split between those who ignored the story and those who reported that Israel had eliminated a terrorist. Equipped with zero information, nearly everyone mobilized to tell the story that the Israel Defense Forces dictated to them and to hell with the truth. And also to hell with showing solidarity to a brave colleague.

Haut du formulaire

Palestinians recite the Fatiha over the grave of Al Jazeera correspondent Anas Al-Sharif, who was killed alongside other journalists in an Israeli strike, at a cemetery in Gaza City on August Tuesday.Credit: AFP/BASHAR TALEB

The only evidence presented was a photograph of Al-Sharif with Hamas chief Yahya Sinwar. This is indeed grounds for execution.

A million times braver than any Israeli journalist, and less co-opted to serve the propaganda of his state and his people than Nir Dvori and Or Heller, Al-Sharif could have taught members of the Israeli media the fundamentals of journalism.

The chutzpah of the press here knows no bounds: Al Jazeera is a propaganda network, scream the reporters from the Israeli TV channels, who have given a bad name to ultranationalist propaganda and the concealment of truth during this war.

If Al Jazeera is propaganda, then what is Channel 12? And channels 11, 13, 14 and 15? Do they have any connection at all to journalism in this war?

Palestinian children and a journalist check the destroyed Al Jazeera tent at Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City on Monday following an overnight strike by the Israeli military.Credit: AFP/BASHAR TALEB

When journalism died, so too did truth and solidarity. Those who have killed more journalists in this war than have been killed in any other in history – 186 according to the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists, 263 according to B'Tselem – will one day also turn their guns on us, the Israeli journalists who do not find favor in their eyes. It's hard to understand how Israeli journalists fail to comprehend this. Or perhaps they plan to continue their submissive service to the Israeli propaganda machine, because in their eyes, this is journalism.

But this week, the IDF shelled a press tent, and the scenes you didn't see were horrifying: bodies of journalists were pulled from the burning tent, and their Israeli colleagues cheered or were silent. What a disgrace, both personal and professional. How is this less shocking than the 2018 murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi? Because they didn't dismember al-Sharif's body?

Al-Sharif's friends and his will say that he knew he was a target. When the IDF began making threats on his life in October, Irene Khan, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression, said she was concerned for his fate. Al-Sharif, she said, was the last surviving journalist in the northern Gaza Strip. That's precisely why Israel killed him. "Do not forget Gaza," were the last words in his will.

 

LYNA AL TABAL A hundred years of hell in Palestine

Dr Lyna Al Tabal, Rai Al Youm, 1/8/2025

Translated by Tlaxcala

France has finally decided to recognise the State of Palestine.

In the month when the leaves fall and lies blossom on the banks of the Seine, France has finally granted recognition — timid, belated, seven decades behind...

And UK, the very country that sold off land that did not belong to it, has decided in turn to make a gesture... But Resolution 67/19, adopted by 138 countries at the United Nations General Assembly in 2012, had already granted Palestine the status of ‘non-member observer state’, on the same footing as the Vatican. It was on this basis that Palestine was able to join international organisations and treaties, such as the International Criminal Court and UNESCO.

Okay, you Europeans number 450 million. Your economy is worth $20 trillion. You shine on the stock markets and dominate the markets... But tell me: can your governments weigh even a kilogram of justice? A handful of dignity? Recognition seventy years late – is that your offer? You call that a gesture? You are giving Palestine nothing. Nothing. Is that all you have to offer? Really?

Will this recognition stop a tank? Will it warm the cold bed of a murdered mother? Bring a child back to life? No.

Yes, Europe loves Palestine... but from afar. Like one loves a lost cause, an oriental myth, a poem by Mahmoud Darwish framed on the wall of a Parisian living room. And you know it: Israel will swallow this recognition like it swallows the West Bank — whole.

Enough talk.

The world doesn't need another declaration. It just needs you to stop arming the killer.

This recognition is a caricature. What Palestine needs is for this complicity to end. The UN condemns Israel every day. What has that changed? Gaza is dying of hunger, suffering genocide, crimes, misery...

Three colours dominate: the grey of the ruins, the red of the blood, and the bright gold of disaster – that of the markets thriving on the rubble. There is no need for further statements. Keep your ‘courageous’ gestures. Jeffrey Sachs is not a revolutionary. He is an expert, a man who simply tells the truth: ‘Stop supplying arms to Israel, and the war will end.’

The solution begins with one word: responsibility. The responsibility of Israel, but also of all those who support it. Imposing sanctions is the minimum. Their Prime Minister is accused? Then let him be taken to The Hague in handcuffs and let the trials begin – if you still believe in that word: peace.

The only measure that makes sense in this region is the disarmament of Israel.

But what can Europe do in the face of the great powers that dictate their laws and impose their will? The Trump administration has not even bothered to hide its imperialism: ‘We will do what we want, you are worthless,’ it has proclaimed.

All this is merely the logical consequence of a choice: that of the Western world, which has preferred unipolarity to justice.

Let's not waste our time today by condemning Abu Mazen (President of the Palestinian [In]Authority)... There's no point in shooting at a hearse: history will judge him in the end.

And for goodness' sake, stop shouting ‘Where are the Arabs?’ — that question no longer makes sense. It's a stupid question.

The Arabs, my friend, have disappeared...

All that's left is you, me, and a handful of believers, dreamers, who can be counted on the fingers of one hand.

They have disappeared, like ancient species. So don't ask where they are.

All this has happened because the Western world has decided to move towards a single empire that does not resemble it and does not respect it. Europe could have prevented this war or mitigated its violence... but it chose to fall in love!

Europe is like an old lady wearing a hat made of colourful peacock feathers, who believes that America loves her... She is blinded by her love for America. Since the late 1990s, Europe has not adopted an independent foreign policy, except for a policy of hostility towards Russia... Russia is a Soviet nightmare for her, when it should have been a trading partner, but she has decided to be Washington's unhappy mistress.

Ursula von der Leyen, the official spokesperson for the American empire within the European Commission, is a ridiculous woman! You know, of course, that it is American officials who run Europe, but you continue to pretend that Brussels is the capital of Europe.

You know very well that it is Washington that calls the shots...

And yet, despite everything, you smile and wave the European flag proudly.

There is no security for Ukraine, nor for Europe, nor even for your children's dreams, in this insane American adventure that you have joined and become the leaders of.

You are complicit in a million deaths. Yes, you knowingly participated in this massacre in Ukraine.

You have sown only death. And what has changed? Nothing.

Let's return to the American position. Trump, true to form, threatens: ‘America will enter Ukraine to finish the job.’

And Putin, also true to form, bursts out laughing: “Let him talk... He always does the opposite of what he says”.

In Palestine, the situation is very clear, Mike Huckabee says there is no possible solution in Palestine!

The US has abandoned its policy in the Mashreq and handed it over to Benjamin Netanyahu... It is the Israeli lobby that dominates US policy. It's a joke!

In 1996, at the height of the peace talks, while Israelis and Palestinians were sitting in the negotiating rooms, shaking hands in Madrid, negotiating in Oslo and placing Palestinian flags alongside United Nations flags, and while Yasser Arafat was modifying the pact in the hope of a state, Netanyahu and his USAmerican Zionist advisers were preparing a plan to replace the two-state solution with a ‘solution by force’: encircle Syria, strike Iraq and suffocate the Palestinians. And strike any alliance that formed to support Palestine, including Hezbollah and Hamas. They called this solution "A Clean Break " because they had decided to break away permanently and impose their reality.

Based on this document, the US waged seven wars in five years. General Wesley Clark carried out the instructions of the Israeli political bureau. You can listen to General Wesley Clark on the Internet, he talks about this subject. He was NATO's commander-in-chief in 1999... These are Netanyahu's wars, by the way: to eliminate the remnants of the Soviet allies, dismantle the system of every state, every alliance and organisation hostile to Israel, and sow chaos in the region.

And every time a war broke out, Netanyahu would flash that same smile — the smile of a man lighting a cigarette at the first sign of depression. For thirty years, he has tirelessly repeated his vision: there will be only one state, Israel.

‘And any dissenting voice will be crushed — not by us directly, but by our American friends,’ he said. That, in general, is the policy of the United States in the Mashreq, even today.

This policy did not begin with Trump, nor with Biden, and it was not invented by Clinton, Bush or Obama. It is the tedious game of U.S.  politics: if you are not with us, you are against us, and if you are against us, wait for your regime to collapse from within. Is this not the daily reality of U.S. politics? Since World War II, the US has constantly intervened directly in the affairs of other countries, under the guise of a fallacious discourse on democracy. Between 1945 and 1989, it brought about seventy regime changes. It accused the Soviets of wanting to conquer the world, then used this pretext to conquer the world itself...

Our destiny is already mapped out, set in stone for the next hundred years... But we have this habit of surprising them, of sabotaging their most sinister plans. They thought Gaza would collapse in a month. They dug our graves, pitched their tents in the Sinai and redrew the maps of the region.

What a grotesque illusion! They believed that Gaza was just an inconvenient detail to be swept away in a few weeks. But every massacre gave birth to a new missile: from the Qassam to the Yassin, then the Badr-3; from the Ayyash 250 to the R160, to the Al-Quds and the Asif al-Ghadab.

What impotence! Have you forgotten that Gaza defies even the laws of physics? Everything that is thrown at it... ends up bouncing back.

They gambled on the colonisation of the West Bank — and they won that gamble.

They believed that a military victory would signify the end of the conflict. But Gaza reminds them every moment: this is not a battle, it is an existence.

What victory can be claimed when the stability of an army depends on a box of Prozac? A state that can only stand with antidepressants is not a state: it is a patient.

This is not advice, but a warning — cold, clear — from an enemy who does not like you... but does not even wish you dead.

It is simply telling you: go home.

The further you extend the borders of Greater Israel, the closer you run to the wall of nothingness.

For the closer you get to this imperial dream, the more it loses its meaning.

You may have won a few battles, but you are wasting what matters most: time.

And history never forgets arrogance.

The more you expand, the more vulnerable you become. The further you go, the more you exhaust yourselves. Look at Ben Gvir: a sham minister, ranting like a simpleton — ‘Send bombs, not aid to Gaza!’ "

He believes that history is written by shouting. He thinks that missiles can replace memory.

But war is not won only on the battlefield. It is won — or lost — in books, in people's minds, in the mark you leave behind.

And history, my enemies, is not dictated by megaphones. It remembers. And it will consign you — you, your bombs, your buffoons — to the red margin of eternal shame.

Tell me how? Tell me, for God's sake, how can a state claim victory when it has already lost the story?

Because one day — soon — everyone will read that Israel was a fascist state, an apartheid regime that razed cities, annihilated peoples, brought down governments to survive... and then collapsed, suffocated by its own hatred.

And that history is not being written by Tel Aviv. It is being written by Gaza.

Gaza is writing it with its rockets, with its blood, with a will that neither bombs nor tanks can break.

You will read it in a few years. And your children will read it in their school textbooks.

And on that day, they will look at you... and they will feel ashamed.