By 250,000 votes: Abelardo beats Iván Cepeda in Colombia

The result fell like a hammer blow: the reactionary candidate Abelardo de la Espriella defeated left-wing candidate Iván Cepeda on Sunday by less than a 1% margin (12,959,542 votes to 12,708,712). Below is an initial analysis of the results. –FG, Tlaxcala

The electoral landscape: two Colombias face to face

Click to see details of the results

The conservative strongholds of the centre and the Andes

Abelardo de la Espriella built his victory on a clearly identified territorial base: the departments of the country's centre, the Andean regions and part of the eastern plains. Antioquia constitutes the heart of his electorate with 2.18 million votes (64.42%), more than one million ahead of his opponent. The dominance there is overwhelming, as it is in Norte de Santander (76.56%) and Santander (64.58%).

The candidate also wins across the entire Coffee Axis (Caldas, Quindío, Risaralda), in Tolima, Huila, Boyacá and Cundinamarca. These departments, which concentrate a significant share of the population and national GDP, provided the margins needed for his victory in the national count. Cundinamarca and Antioquia are among the most populous departments, which partly explains De la Espriella's final victory despite his defeat in a greater number of departments.

The progressive strongholds: Caribbean, Pacific and South

Iván Cepeda, for his part, wins 19 departments (including Bogotá) against 13 for his opponent, but often with less densely populated areas. His strongest bastions are in the peripheral regions:

• The Colombian Pacific: Chocó (81.37%), Cauca (75.64%), Nariño (76.72%), Valle del Cauca (60.82%).
• The Amazonian South: Putumayo (78.52%), Vaupés (80.86%), Amazonas (61.89%).
• The Caribbean region: Bolívar (59.51%), Córdoba (58.28%), Atlántico (58.61%), La Guajira (60.45%), Sucre (59.19%), Magdalena (57.02%).
• Bogotá D.C.: the capital, with its 2.23 million votes (52.47%), constitutes a major urban stronghold for Cepeda.

Valle del Cauca offers a particularly illustrative case: Cepeda obtains 1.4 million votes there, a lead of 534,083 ballots over De la Espriella, confirming that this department is one of the main strongholds of the left in Colombia.

The electoral result in Botero style

Sociological analysis of the divides

A centre-periphery divide

The electoral map draws a major geographic divide between:

1. The central and Andean departments: economically more developed, home to traditional elites and industrial centres (Medellín, Bucaramanga), they voted for the conservative candidate.
2. The peripheries: coastal regions (Caribbean, Pacific) and border areas, historically marginalised, massively supported the candidate for change.

This opposition is not new in Colombia: it harks back to the historical distinction between "conservative" Andean regions and "liberal" coastal regions, which the contemporary political system has reactivated.

The ethnic and racialized dimension

Departments with large Afro-Colombian and indigenous populations voted overwhelmingly for Iván Cepeda. This is particularly clear in Chocó (81.37%), Cauca (75.64%) and Nariño (76.72%), regions where black and indigenous communities are historically mobilised around issues of social justice and recognition. The presence of Aida Quilcué, an indigenous figure, as Cepeda's running mate, undoubtedly reinforced this support.

A divided urban vote

The vote in large cities is more mixed than it appears. Bogotá supports Cepeda, but with a relatively modest margin (52.47%). Valle del Cauca votes for Cepeda, but Medellín, the country's second city, is a stronghold of De la Espriella. The results confirm an urban fracture, where the large metropolises of the Andean regions lean right while those of the peripheries (Cali, Barranquilla, Cartagena) lean left.

Tight margins in key departments

Some departments were highly contested, reflecting a deeply divided Colombian society:

• Caquetá: Cepeda wins by a narrow margin with 48.97% against 48.7%.
• Guaviare: De la Espriella wins with 52.78%.
• Vichada: Cepeda prevails with 54.43%.

These results testify to the absence of a homogeneous ideological stronghold in areas of recent colonisation and border regions.

The overseas vote

One notable point: De la Espriella wins overwhelmingly among Colombians abroad (63.76%), with 382,000 votes against 208,000 for Cepeda. This diaspora vote, often composed of expatriate middle and upper classes, contributed significantly to his victory.

Conclusion: a geographically fractured Colombia

The 2026 runoff confirms Colombia's electoral geography as a space of tensions between two visions of the country. The conservative candidate, De la Espriella, was able to capitalise on the traditional strongholds of the centre and the Andes, while Cepeda gathered an archipelago of peripheries: the Pacific, the Caribbean, the Amazon and the capital.

This configuration recalls that Colombia's political divide remains strongly territorialised, with each region expressing distinct social, economic and identity-based expectations. De la Espriella's narrow victory (a margin of less than 250,000 votes) means he will have to govern a country whose broad geographic half did not grant him its trust.