Affichage des articles triés par pertinence pour la requête lena bloch. Trier par date Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles triés par pertinence pour la requête lena bloch. Trier par date Afficher tous les articles

11/01/2022

ANTONIO MAZZEO
Google strengthens its grip on the web by buying Israeli 'cyber security' company Siemplify

Antonio Mazzeo, Pagine Esteri, 7/1/2022
Translated by
Lena Bloch

By buying an Israeli startup, Google is strengthening its presence in the global cyber security market. With a press release issued on January 4, the transnational IT company headquartered in the USA has announced the acquisition of Siemplify, a leading data management and analysis company and SOAR (security orchestration, automation and response) provider, headquartered in Ramat Gan, a city on the eastern outskirts of Tel Aviv. Google reportedly spent no less than $500 million on the deal.

 

“Siemplify shares our vision in the cybersecurity space and with Google Cloud's specialized team will help companies better manage their threat response,” the transnational's management explains. Specifically, the Israeli start-up's applications will be made available to the Google Cloud Platform, the suite of “cloud computing” services that Google uses for its best-known products, such as the eponymous search engine, Gmail, Google Drive and the YouTube channel.

“In a time when cyberattacks are rapidly growing in both frequency and sophistication, there’s never been a better time to bring these two companies together,” adds the Google Cloud press office. “With Siemplify we will change the rules on how organizations hunt, detect and respond to threats. Siemplify's platform enables Security Operation Center analysts to manage responses with speed and accuracy and will be integrated into Google Cloud's Chronicle cybersecurity group. Its proven SOAR capability combined with Chronicle's innovative approach will be an important step in improving the tools available to the cyber security industry.”

Siemplify founders: from l. to r. Alon Cohen, Amos Stern and Garry Fatakhov. Photo: Siemplify

Siemplify was founded in 2015 and major customers include Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, McAfee, Cisco and some of Israel's leading security companies and start-ups. Co-founder and CEO is Amos Stern, formerly an analyst in the intelligence department of the Israeli Defense Forces, then sales manager of the Cyber & Intelligence division of Elbit Ltd, one of the largest companies in Israel's military-industrial complex. Similar is the professional resume of Siemplify's other co-founder and CEO, Alon Cohen.

07/04/2022

JORGE MAJFUD
Russia and NATO: the world's most dangerous game

Jorge Majfud, 5/4/2022

Translated by Lena Bloch

 While with one hand, the world's major media are constantly reproducing the horrifying images of hundreds of corpses scattered in Bucha, Ukraine - with the other hand they are stoking the fires of an escalation of war that could lead us to a nuclear holocaust in a course of months.
 

Tasos Anastasiou, Greece

Whoever committed the massacre (it seems most likely to have been Russian soldiers), it will go down in the annals of history as an unforgivable crime. But I think the smoke is obscuring the horizon. We can't see where we come from and worse, we can't see where we are going. Although I have repeated it in different media since long before the war, wrong or not, I will focus on these two sides of the road that the fire does not let you see.

Let's start with a simple and more immediate question: instead of continuing the endless, dangerous, and notoriously useless game of arbitral sanctions, why not impose the obligation to negotiate a resolution to the conflict between Russia and NATO once and for all and before innocent people continue to die?

A reasonable solution would be the dissolution of NATO in exchange for Russia's withdrawal from Ukraine, but that would be labeled radical. The owners of the business do not negotiate.

There are many other options, such as the most obvious and pragmatic one, i.e. Ukraine's neutral status (with provincial autonomy of the Donbas), which is where it should start instead of provoking Russia by integrating Ukraine into NATO and deploying missiles four minutes away from Moscow.

The neutrality or non-membership of NATO has always been the case of Austria, Finland, Sweden and other neighboring countries, some of which have just expressed the possibility of joining NATO, showing where the business of the old war merchants is going and demonstrating, once again, that the fight against communism - and not only in Latin America - has been nothing more than the perfect excuse to maintain geopolitical dominance and protect corporate, class and capital interests.

What do they intend, apart from expanding militarization more and more in a world, now that they have run out of the excuse of communism and, more recently, of Islamic terrorism, which in Afghanistan alone left eight trillion dollars in profits to the big companies specialized in "security"?

Do they think that having Russia surrounded by that anachronistic and mafia-like NATO organization would make Europe and the world a safer place?

You have to be under the influence of alcohol to forget that we are talking about one of the two atomic superpowers and imagine such stupidity. Or such wickedness of organized crime. If it were really about "security", if they were really sincere about "the right to defend themselves" that countries have, they would never have tried to break this order which, judging by the ongoing war, has not made the world, much less Ukraine. safer, but quite the opposite.

Of course, those who have that bargaining power are not being splashed with the blood of Russians and Ukrainians but, on the contrary, are doing their business, so it may take a few weeks, if not months, for them to stop shedding crocodile tears over the whiskey and get down to serious negotiations.

06/09/2022

DILYANA GAYTANDZHIEVA
Documents reveal supply of 47 tons of controlled drugs to US military

Dilyana Gaytandzhieva, ОБЕКТИВНО, 5/9/2022
Translated by Lena Bloch

Bill Mauldin, Chicago Sun-Times, 1972

The Pentagon is shipping dozens of tons of controlled drugs to U.S. military bases around the world, documents obtained by the U.S. Federal Register of Contracts reveal. The U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) has contracted with fourteen U.S. airlines to transport military cargo, including sensitive cargo (narcotics) to various locations around the world. The delivery schedule shows a planned total of 47.5 tons of controlled drugs (2018–2023) to U.S. military bases overseas.

The projected quantity for Romania alone is 10 tons of controlled drugs, Kosovo is 5 tons, and Estonia is 2 tons, while the projected shipments of controlled drugs to the other destinations are in a significantly smaller quantity of 898 kg per base (the quantities shown in the document are measured in the U.S. unit of lbs, 1 lbs equals 0.453592 kg).

Schedule for the delivery of military cargo, including controlled drugs, to U.S. military bases worldwide in Pentagon Category A Federal Contract Announcement HTC71117RCC05. Source: govtribe.com

Kosovo — 11 117 lbs (2018–2023) or 5 042 kg

Romania — 21 607 lbs (2018–2023) or 9 800 kg

Malatya — 2803 lbs (2018–2023) or 1271 kg

Erbil — 1457 lbs (2018–2023) or 660 kg

Estonia — 4 516 lbs (2018–2023) or 2 048 kg

Estimated quantities for other U.S. military bases are 1,980 pounds or 898 kilograms of controlled drugs per base (2018–2023) Source

The total quantity of controlled drugs to be supplied is 47 560 kg (2018–2023).

US Army — the largest user of controlled drugs in the world

The U.S. Department of Defense has awarded a $23 million contract (2020–2025) for the supply of amphetamines, according to another federal order posted on the U.S. Federal Contracts Register.

According to the contract notice, the annual consumption by the Department of Defense alone is 15.6 million amphetamine tablets.

Pentagon Dextroamphetamine/Amphetamine Federal Order Notice SPE2D2–20-R-0062.

Amphetamine — a widely used drug in the US military

Read more

24/07/2022

WERNER RÜGEMER
The truth about corruption, poverty, prostitution, surrogate motherhood, land grabbing and exploitation in Ukraine

 Werner Rügemer, Nachdenkseiten, 21/7/2022
Translated by Lena Bloch

Ukraine is corrupt — we know, doesn’t matter, it’s for the good cause. But the poorest and sickest population, country as a hub of Europe-wide low-wage and cigarette smuggling, world leader in trafficking of the female body — and more soldiers than any European NATO state.


When a statutory minimum wage was first introduced in Ukraine, in 2015, it was 0.34 euros, or 34 cents per hour. After that, it was increased: in 2017 it was 68 cents, in 2019 it was 10 cents more, which is still 78 cents, and since 2021 it has been 1.21 euros. Ever heard of it?

 Even this lowest wage is not always paid

Of course, this doesn’t mean that this minimum wage is actually paid correctly in this state. Thus, for a full work week in 2017, the monthly minimum wage was 96 euros. But in the textile and leather industry, for example, this minimum wage for one-third of the mostly female workforce only came about through forced and not specifically paid overtime. Payment by the piece is also widespread — a certain number of shirts must be sewn in one hour; if this does not work out, unpaid reworking is required.

If there were no orders, unpaid leave was ordered. In many cases, the annual vacation due by law was not granted or not paid. Management prevented the election of employee representatives. With this minimum wage, people were far below the official subsistence level: It amounted to 166 euros in the year in question.

The Hunger Wage Chain from Ukraine to Neighboring EU Countries

There are about 2,800 officially registered textile companies, but also a presumably equally high number of unregistered small businesses. For decades, they have formed a normal shadow economy, often in small towns and villages.

Yet most of these companies rank only as second-class suppliers for the internationally better-connected low-cost producers in neighboring EU countries, especially in Poland, but also in Romania and Hungary.

Thus 41 percent of the shoes go as starvation-wage semi-finished goods from Ukraine first to the low-wage factories of Romania, Hungary and Italy: There they get the benign and beautiful label “Made in EU”.


 Textile workers themselves can only afford second-hand imports from Germany

The majority of the approximately 220,000 textile workers are older women. They keep their heads above water only by subsistence farming, for example by having their own garden with a chicken coop. Diseases due to malnutrition are common.

The textile workers mostly buy their own clothes from second-hand imports, which come mainly from Germany, Poland, Belgium, Switzerland and the USA. Ukraine imports much more textiles than it exports.

The expensive Boss and Esprit imports from the rich EU West, which are pre-produced in Ukraine, are destined for the rich elite and the NGO bubble in Kiev — while the majority of imports are the cheapest second-hand textiles. The textile workers, as well as the majority of the population, can only afford the almost free disposable textiles from the rich states.[1]

But Western unions and “human rights activists” still look to Asia and Bangladesh for low-wage jobs in the textile industry that violate human rights. Although low wages in Ukraine are much lower. Also in the current discussions in the EU and in the German Bundestag about a supply chain law: There the view goes far out, globally, to Asia, while the EU-Ukrainian poverty chain is denied.

Here it sits, the corruption: C&A, Hugo Boss, Adidas, Marks&Spencer, New Balance, Esprit, Zara, Mexx are the profiting end users. They live from the exploitation which is against human rights. Here in the rich EU states sit the main players of corruption. Clammily they gleefully welcome the non-existent or complicit labor inspectorate of the Ukrainian state, and the EU covers the systemic labor injustice as well, with ritual hypocritical and inconsequential admonition of corruption in Ukraine.[2]

Automotive suppliers, pharmaceuticals, mechanical engineering

The textile and leather industries are similar to other sectors. Ukraine was a focal point of industrial production in the Soviet Union. After independence in 1991, oligarchs took over the companies, made profits, and put nothing into innovation. For Western companies, millions of well-qualified employees were available — at low wages.

Thousands of companies, mainly from the USA and EU countries — about 2,000 from Germany alone — placed subcontracting orders for rather simple parts: Porsche, VW, BMW, Schaeffler, Bosch and Leoni, for example, for car cables; pharmaceutical groups such as Bayer, BASF, Henkel, Ratiopharm and Wella have their products filled and packaged; Arcelor Mittal, Siemens, Demag, Vaillant, Viessmann maintain assembly and sales branches. Wages of two to three euros are paid here, i.e. more than the minimum wage, but still lower than in the neighboring EU countries of Hungary, Poland and Romania.

This is why the Ukrainian sites are closely networked with the sites of the same companies in these neighboring EU countries, where the statutory minimum wages are above 3 euros and below 4 euros. However, the networking is just as valid with the even poorer neighboring states of Moldova, Georgia and Armenia, which are not EU members. Branches are also operated here. In the course of the “Eastern Neighborhood”, organized by the EU, all differences of qualification, even lower payment are exploited — with Ukraine as a revolving door.

Labor migration in millions

This selective exploitation of locational advantages by Western capitalists has not led to national economic development, on the contrary. Ukraine became economically impoverished. The majority of the population has been made poorer and sicker. A mass reaction is labor migration.

It began early on. By the late 1990s, several hundred thousand Ukrainians had emigrated to Russia. Wages were not much higher, but in Russia excessive Westernization of lifestyles and increases in the cost of living for food, rent, health and government fees do not stick.

Since the 2000s, and accelerated by the aftermath of the 2014 Maidan coup, some 5 million Ukrainians have been migrant workers — about two million more or less permanently abroad, and about three million commuting to neighboring states. In particular, the Polish state, which in any case lays claim to western parts of Ukraine, encourages labor migration from Ukraine. About two million Ukrainians are employed in Poland, mainly in low-skilled jobs as cleaners, domestic helpers, waiters, caretakers for the elderly, and truck drivers. [3] In Poland, the business of employment agencies is also flourishing: they declare Ukrainians to be Polish citizens and place them as home care workers in Germany and Switzerland, for example: they pay the minimum wage there for a 40-hour week, but in reality the care workers have to be on call 24 hours a day, according to the contract with the Polish agency.

Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians are also employed on a permanent basis, on a temporary basis or shuttling back and forth in Romania, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, with minimum wages between 3.10 euros and 3.76 euros. Ukrainians are happy about this, even if they are pushed a bit below these minimum wages — it is still much better than in their home country, and the labor inspectorate says nothing and the EU says nothing either.

Students from Ukraine like to be engaged seasonal workers in EU agriculture. In Lower Saxony alone, there are about 7,000 students annually, who admittedly do not necessarily study, but enter with forged matriculation papers. Neither in Ukraine nor in Germany is there any control, as a study by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation found.[4]

Minimum wage in Lithuania: in 2015 it was 1.82 euros, five times higher than in Ukraine at the time; in 2020 it was 3.72 euros. The EU is promoting the development of Lithuania into a European freight forwarding center: with the help of artificial intelligence, cheap and willing truck drivers from third countries such as Ukraine and Moldova, but also from further afield such as the Philippines, are steered across Europe. They don’t need to learn any language; they receive their instructions via smartphone and navigator. For example, with the start of the war in Ukraine, trucking companies in Lithuania and Poland were suddenly short of over 100,000 truck drivers — from Ukraine, they were not allowed to leave because of military service.[5]

Women’s Poverty I: Forbidden Prostitution Flourishes

The patriarchal oligarch state of Ukraine has extremely deepened the inequality between men and women. With a 32 percent gender pay gap, Ukrainian women are in the very last place in Europe: on average, they receive one-third less pay than their male counterparts, and in the field of finance and insurance the figure is as high as 40 percent for the same work[6] — the EU average is 14 percent. Because of patriarchal stereotypes, women are also particularly often pushed into precarious part-time jobs, even more so than in Merkel’s Germany, which ranks second to last among EU countries in terms of discrimination against women.

This patriarchal poverty of women includes the prohibition of prostitution, which, however, particularly flourishes under these very conditions. Primary school teachers, who cannot get by on their 120 euros a month, are also among the estimated 180,000 women who work as prostitutes in Ukraine, divorced single women with children, the unemployed.

Because prostitution is forbidden, brothel operators earn money, as do police officers and cab drivers, because they have a good income through silence. Private apartments are also used, like the brothels in prime locations in the capital Kiev. Tourists are lured in — with 80 euros they are in. Eight services per night — not uncommon. A little less than half of the income remains with the women. Some hope for a transitional period of one, two or even three years. Often in vain. One-third become drug addicts, one-third are HIV-positive.[7]

After the “liberalization” of sexual services by the federal government of Schröder/SPD and Fischer/Greens, Germany became the “brothel of Europe”. The federally owned development agency GTZ advertised in its “Germany Travel Guide for Women” for Ukrainian women who now had good prospects in the sex business. Many came. Merkel’s Germany became the European center for commercial prostitution, the majority of which was also illegal and tolerated by the authorities — favorable conditions for women who did not come from an EU member state. So it stands to reason that pimps are now trying to recruit fleeing Ukrainian women already at the border in 2022.[8]


 Women’s Poverty II: The Female Body as Exploitation Material

Ukraine is a pleasing location for Western companies to engage in practices that are otherwise forbidden, a thousandfold site for U.S.-led globalization. This is also true for the commercial use of the female body, far beyond illegal prostitution.

Ukraine is the global hot spot for industrial surrogacy, with more extensive “liberalization” than otherwise. Widespread female poverty provides an inexhaustible reservoir.

Vittoria Vita, La Vita Nova, Delivering Dreams or more prosaically BioTech — these are the names under which surrogacy agencies in Kiev and Kharkiv advertise their services and their women. Pretty, healthy Ukrainian women are offered in catalogs for wealthy foreigners. Between 39,900 and 64,900 euros are the prices for a healthy delivered baby. The wish child tourists come from the USA, Canada, Western Europe, and China.[9].

The intended parents couple delivers egg and sperm in one of the dozens of special clinics. They are fertilized in a test tube. Then the foreign embryo is implanted in the surrogate mother. The surrogate mother carries a genetically foreign child. This was developed in the USA, but it is much more expensive there: between 110,000 and 240,000 euros. In Ukraine it is less regulated. The woman carrying the child must not have anything to do genetically with the child, she is just a foreign tool that is to be forgotten immediately after use, no longer exists at all — and is ready for the next use for a completely different foreign couple.

The prices differ depending on whether the intended parents want a specific gender for their ordered baby or not: without a choice of gender, it costs 39,900 euros at BioTech, with two attempts at the desired gender it costs 49,900 euros, and with unlimited attempts it costs 64,900 euros. These offers include hotel accommodation, issuance of birth certificate and passport in the German consulate. So far, more than 10,000 such babies have been delivered worldwide.

The surrogate mother — a surrogate mother company bears the appropriate name: Surrogacy Ukraine — receives a monthly bonus of between 300 and 400 euros during pregnancy; after successful delivery of the product, the bonus is increased to 15,000 euros. If there is a miscarriage, the child is disabled or its adoption is refused, the surrogate mothers get nothing. Their psychological condition is not taken into account, and there is no social security against damage to their health. There are no studies on the long-term consequences.

Read more

 

03/01/2022

MILENA RAMPOLDI
“Most leftists have become victims of their trust in the State during the pandemic”: Michael Schneider on the ongoing “transnational biopolitical seizure of power”

 Milena Rampoldi, ProMosaik, 2/1/2022
Translated by
Lena Bloch

On the subject of coronavirus and the relationship between medicine and totalitarianism, I spoke with Prof. Michael Schneider (born 1943). Schneider is a writer and committed socialist, known among other things to this day from his time in the student movement, as the author of “Neurose und Klassenkampf” [“Neurosis and Class Struggle”. Engl. ‘Neurosis and Civilization : a Marxist/freudian Synthesis’, Seabury Press 1976] and as the founder of the first Socialist Street Theater in West Berlin. He stands out for his sharp criticism of the status quo, and thus also by criticism of the prevailing “covid-variants” narrative, which contains many elements that are not only political but also neurotic. But it changed and became somewhat different. Power today is different. And totalitarianism today is different.


In this Covid era, the connection between medicine, power and totalitarianism escapes the minds of so many, why is that?

The fact that the connection between medicine, power, and totalitarianism escapes the minds of so many is primarily because of the very nature of this new narrative, which is highly sophisticated and effective in its mass-psychological impact: That Sars-Cov-2 is a killer virus threatening all humanity, against which “we are at war,” as the French president proclaimed in April 2020.

In times of war and crisis, there is almost always seems to be  a unity of purpose between the State and the citizens. In the permanent “war against Corona” and its ever-new “dangerous variants,” things are now similar to Orwell's ‘1984,’ where people are constantly mobilized and incited  into fictitious wars against new enemies that no one ever gets to see. Even more sophisticated, indeed of almost sadistic genius (in the sense of psychological warfare) is the narrative (concocted by U.S. intelligence agencies and think tanks) of an invisible, treacherous enemy who can strike anytime, anywhere, and who can lurk inside any of us, inside your neighbor, your work colleague, even inside your dearest relatives, and even more so inside yourself.

Particularly insidious is the postulate of the “asymptomatically sick person" who, as a “super-spreader", endangers everyone else, fueling the suspicion of everyone against everyone and leading to a complete reversal of the presumption of innocence: In the fight against the invisible enemy, all people are not potentially healthy, but potentially sick. Every person is a suspected case that has not yet been checked and is a potential danger and must prove his or her innocence by means of rapid tests or vaccinations. If he/she fails to do so, removal and restrictions are permissible self-defense measures of society.

This narrative is new and so successful not least because it takes into its service above all collective ideals such as solidarity, responsibility towards fellow human beings, etc., which are dear to the left in particular. That is why its treacherous nature is not recognized by most leftists, social democrats and left-wing socialists, especially since they have just now, in the covid crisis, become the victims of their faith in the State: The fact that, after thirty years of neoliberal privatization and austerity policies (also and especially in the health sector), the hitherto weak State is now suddenly taking the reins and, as it seems, making the health of its citizens the top maxim of its actions, is seen by them as proof of the regained ethical dimension of politics. But why should the otherwise unscrupulous ruling elites have had suddenly decided to stop the global profit machine in the face of a pathogen that almost exclusively affects the "unproductive," the over-80s? 

John Melhuish Strudwick, A Golden Thread, 1885

 

How different is power in these times from power in the traditional sense?

Unlike traditional dictatorships and totalitarian systems, most of which are or were organized along nation-states’ lines (which by no means precluded alliances between them - think of the fascist Axis powers of Germany, Italy and Japan) and which eliminated their political opponents or deported them into camps, this time we are dealing with a transnational biopolitical seizure of power that “begins at the level of global governance and cuts deeply into the sovereignty of the individual,” as Kees van der Pijl, professor of international relations at the University of Sussex, has pointed out in his brilliant study, ‘States of Emergency: Keeping the Global Population in Check’ (Clarity Press 2021). “The imposition of a State of Emergency in virtually the entire world was first and foremost a political move, demonstrably long in the making and coordinated in a series of transnational think tanks and supranational organizations such as the WHO and the World Bank. On their advice and explicit instructions, governments have put their populations in a stranglehold. After all, what is at stake is the survival of the existing social order, which has been run down socially, economically and environmentally.”

However, the program being implemented in the slipstream of the "pandemic," the so-called “Great Reset” (as the programmatic paper by Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret reads) has nothing to do with health. Rather, it is about maintaining the power of the oligarchy, the transnational ruling class centered around a new power bloc of intelligence agencies, IT giants and media conglomerates.